哎，文章被拒稿了

aiYes

Dear Drs. XX XX XX XXI have received two reviews of your manuscript. They are copied below. Ihave also attached a copy of the PDF that was sent to the reviewers, as itwill help you follow their reference to line numbers.Both reviewers agree that the data set is not sufficient (only one rapidlyevolving marker is used, and the exemplar choice needs more thought), andthe analyses and subsequent discussion are not currently publishable. Bothreviewers also agree that the manuscript requires editing. Therefore we mustdecline your submission.Thank you for considering the XX.Regards,XXSection Editor

ochl

oh, shit, hao chang a

韦伯猫

很正常。所以国内论文都不具有参考价值。

悦茗的新号

文化的隔阂。且关键的问题的东西方都觉得自己的逻辑顺序和思维方式是最合理的。所以说入乡随俗吧，毕竟他们是规则的制定者。

stevenlyn

被拒了好几回……

sufuture

太多不认识的字了

IPXzerg

退稿意见这么短，猜测不是工科。

aiYes

oh, shit, hao chang a
ochl 发表于 2013-8-10 22:33

    What a good yu fa !

aiYes

很正常。所以国内论文都不具有参考价值。
韦伯猫 发表于 2013-8-10 22:38

    目测我这一篇最后还是国内的料

aiYes

退稿意见这么短，猜测不是工科。
IPXzerg 发表于 2013-8-11 10:55

    这只是总的意见。两个评委的评语没有拿来献丑

xiaozuei00

回复 10# aiYes


    专业英语？

IPXzerg

这只是总的意见。两个评委的评语没有拿来献丑
aiYes 发表于 2013-8-11 13:55

   嗯 国外期刊专家退稿一般有理可据，按照修改能提高论文水平。个人觉得退稿不能算坏事

aiYes

回复  aiYes


    专业英语？
xiaozuei00 发表于 2013-8-11 14:58

    生物相关专业

韦伯猫

关键是没这么多人手，没这么多钱去做实验取数据啊。。。。这是硬伤。人家只看这些。

xiaozuei00

回复 13# aiYes


    你需要专业实验室······